Administrative Driver's License Hearings
Fighting to Protect Your Driving Privileges
There are a number of different offenses that can lead to suspension or revocation of a person's driver's license. For example, a loss of driving privileges might be due to an arrest or conviction for driving under the influence (DUI), reckless driving or an excessive number of traffic offenses within a certain period of time. If you have found yourself in this type of situation, it is important to know that there are ways to challenge your license suspension. You can attempt to do this through your administrative driver's license hearing with the Kansas Department of Revenue. This, however, should only be done with a knowledgeable lawyer by your side.
By turning to Gigstad Law Office, LLC, you can receive legal support from an Overland Park criminal defense attorney, who can fight aggressively to protect your driving privileges and make the best case on your behalf. Attorney Robert "Chris" Gigstad can also help you challenge any criminal charges you might have, which are separate from your administrative hearing.
Understanding the Administrative Hearing Process
After a person receives notification that his or her driver's licenses is being suspended—either directly from a law enforcement officer or by mail—that person will have a certain amount of days to request an administrative hearing with the Department of Revenue. For individuals arrested for alleged DUI offenses, the driver has 14 days. When the suspension or revocation is given for traffic violations, the period for requesting a hearing is usually 30 days. Failing to request your hearing in the appropriate timeframe will result in your driver's license being immediately suspended or revoked.
According to Kansas law, in cases related to traffic offense, the director or director's agent who is overseeing the hearing may issue subpoenas ordering that certain witnesses or documentation be made available. In cases related to DUI, the judge issues an order allowing the licensee (or his or her attorney) to review any audio or video recordings related to the alleged offense.
A competent attorney may be able to show that the officer who made the traffic citation or arrest made certain errors, therefore making your license suspension or revocation unmerited. Your lawyer might even be able to show proof that you did not actually violate any laws. This could lead to your driving restriction being cancelled.
Contact our Overland Criminal Defense Lawyer!
Without the help of a trained legal professional, it can be difficult to navigate the system and properly defend your rights. At Gigstad Law Office, LLC, we fully understand how the Kansas legal system works, as well as how the administrative hearing process works. Let us advocate on your behalf in your administrative hearing.
Contact us today for dependable legal assistance!
-
What Our Clients SayOur clients share their stories about what happened and how we helped.
-
About Our AttorneysWe're here to protect your legal rights and defend your future.
-
Our FAQ'sYou Are Probably Asking Yourself Some Questions
Testimonials
Client-Centered Legal Represntation
-
"I Would Recommend Him to Anyone"Robert represented me on my case in Manhattan, KS with great results. I would recommend him to anyone.Mike
-
"Top Notch Job! Mr. Gigstad Did an Excellent Job"javascript:void('Save')Bill
-
"I Would Highly Recommend Giving Robert a Call"Robert was very easy to work with. He took care of my speeding ticket for a very reasonable fee and had the ticket amended down to a non-moving violation so no points against my drivers license or insurance rate increases. If you have a speeding ticket in the KC area that needs to be dealt with, I would highly recommend giving Robert a call.Mat
-
"Robert Was Extremely Helpful and Great to Work With!"My dad has used Robert for several moving violations in the past and recommended that I give him a call for a speeding ticket of my own. Robert was extremely helpful and great to work with. He successfully got my speeding ticket reduced to a non moving violation.Happy Client
-
"Robert Quickly Found out What Actions I Could Pursue with the Moving Violation I Received"Robert quickly found out what actions I could pursue with the moving violation I received. He took care of everything for me, and all I had to was give him the paperwork. I highly recommend Robert for consultation as my moving violation was skillfully changed to a non-moving violation and kept off my record/insurance.Mike
-
"Excellent Service!!!"Mr. Gigstad provided excellent service in helping me to remedy several traffic tickets, one of which had potentially serious consequences. He was very responsive, attentive and followed through on helping me resolve this situation. He's a great guy as well and I can't recommend him enough!Rod
-
"Robert Was Able to Handle Our Case with the Utmost Professionalism and Discretion"Robert was able to handle our case with the utmost professionalism and discretion. He took the time to outline any and all appropriate courses of action, demonstrating what I viewed as a superior consultative prowess. I was very appreciative of his aid, and would highly recommend him to my family and friends.Adam
-
"I Couldn't Be More Pleased!"I couldn't be more pleased with Mr. Gigstad's services. Contacting a law firm you typically are faced with leaving multiple messages and dealing with secretaries that might not always know the best route to take. From the very first time I contacted Roberts office he personally was always very quick to respond to email and explain exactly what need to be done in my case. You never want the need for a lawyer but if the need arises again I will not hesitate to contact Mr. Gigstad again for his services.Derek
-
DISMISSED STATE OF KANSAS V. J.M.
-
DISMISSED CITY OF OVERLAND PARK V. H.C.
-
Dismissal City of Gardner v. J.V.
First-time DUI dismissed after Attorney Josh Zarse highlighted significant issues in the case.
-
Dismissed before Trial. State of Kansas v. G.E.
1st Time Drug DUI & Speeding. Dismissed before Trial.
-
All Charges Dismissed City of Roeland Park v. B.T.